It’s so nice to be writing again. Yes, I need this break.
I spent a major part of the day musing about two headlines that have once again brought out the thinkers and analysts in all of us — the Hayden Kho-Katrina Halili Sex Video Scandal and Alec Baldwin’s slur against Filipinas. Obviously, these two issues are not related, but considering the magnitude of attention they have drawn, I might as well write my own thoughts about it. I just have to be prepared for possible violent reactions on this piece. Well…this is a free country.
Let’s tackle first the Alec Baldwin incident. On page 6 of today’s edition of the Philippine Daily Inquirer, the headline screamed about Alec Baldwin’s supposed joke during his guesting in the David Letterman Show a few nights back, wherein he said that, being divorced for quite some time, he would like to have a mail-ordered Filipina bride or a Russian one. David Letterman joined in and said he wants one, too. Like any racial slur against Filipinos, Alec Baldwin’s statement didn’t go unnoticed and drew angry reactions from ambassadors, consuls, senators, congressmen, women’s groups, etc. The news item said that the Philippine Consul assigned to New York has already written both Baldwin and Letterman, demanding an apology for their offensive remarks. Not to be outdone, Senator Bong Revilla, Rep. Riza Hontiveros and a host of other legislators have given their piece, essentially stressing that there is a Philippine law, which imposes penal sanctions against those who procure mail-ordered Filipina brides.
Before things get out of hand, ladies and gentlemen, maybe it will do us well if we stand back and try to analyze Baldwin’s comment from a different perspective.
The only reason I could see why Baldwin’s comment came on as offensive is that there are really Filipinas who offer themselves up to foreigners for marriage in hopes of having a better life. In other words, it’s one of those truths that either we couldn’t handle or we refuse to accept, hence, we feel slighted when foreigners, like Baldwin and Letterman, would have the nerve to bring that up. Yes, mail-ordered brides have been outlawed, but the law banning it has not prevented some Filipinas from deliberately using other means solely for the purpose of snagging a potential foreigner-husband.
I’m not saying that we parade Filipinas in pen pal columns (if these still exist) and on the internet like commodities waiting to be sold to the highest bidder who would then marry them. My point simply is that we should not stop at being offended by these racial slurs. Let’s look deeper into the issue and see how far we have come to address it.
“Mail-ordered brides,” notwithstanding being outlawed, are products of our society’s inability to provide for opportunities at a decent education and decent jobs. The short-sightedness of our vision for our country has somehow created an atmosphere, which has conditioned them to view marriage to a foreigner as their only salvation. From where they stand, if their marriage to a foreigner would provide food on the table and send their siblings to school, there should be no issue at all. Quite honestly, there is nothing intrinsically wrong with that kind of thinking.
The flak Alec Baldwin is getting is nothing more than a reflection of a probable lack of genuine understanding of this phenomenon. It would seem that those who have reacted violently towards Baldwin’s comment were just content with having a law banning the procurement of “mail-ordered brides” then throwing this to Baldwin’s face. What have they done beyond passing that law? Lest I be misinterpreted, I’m not defending Alec Baldwin. I have no soft spot for him either. However, let’s be objective. We’ve done our part in making the world know that we won’t take his remarks sitting down. Let’s move on and work on making Filipinas realize that foreigner-husbands, or men, in general, are not their saviors.
On to the exciting world of showbiz…the Katrina Halili-Hayden Kho sex video scandal.
Well, who among us has not seen a sex video scandal? Each scandal seems to be novel at the beginning, but eventually, when everything has been said and done, when the Senate has already conducted its investigation in aid of legislation (remember the Bruneiyuki scandal of the ’90s?), our interest over the scandal wanes. I’m not surprised that everyone who has ever been exposed to this new scandal involving Hayden Kho and Katrina Halili is eager to take sides and give his opinion on who’s to blame, who should be sued, should Hayden Kho’s medical license be revoked, and other questions that will tickle your fancy.
Before I join the fray and give my two cents’ worth, may I be enlightened as to why, in scandals like this, the supposed victims immediately go to the Senate and spark an investigation that would be funded by taxpayers’ money? I mean, really, why the Senate? If they want to file a case against the purported predators, then go to the courts. The Senate does not adjudicate civil, administrative or criminal liability. Victims…you’re just giving these legislators a venue to campaign for their re-election. In the end, we all become the victims of their cheesy and utterly tasteless commercials.
Now that I’ve got that out of my chest, on to Hayden and Katrina.
Guys, these are two consenting adults. Who are we to stop them from showing off their skills in bed? How different is their sex act from all the pornos we have probably seen at one point in our lives? The only reason why there’s so much hoolabaloo about this is that the scandal involves celebrities, and nothing stirs this country more than the dirt that we could dig up about our favorite celebrities (and politicians).
To Katrina…you didn’t know you were being filmed? Puhleeeeease! You can do better than that, hija.
My only discomfort about these scandals involving women who knew fully well what they were doing then cry foul later for reasons known only to them is the immediate sympathy they get from all sorts of groups who are convinced that these women are victims. Again, children, let’s take a step back and analyze this from a different, less emotional perspective.
Actors, whether male or female, who have chosen the path of exposing their body parts and performing sexy/sexual acts in front of the camera cannot be categorized as victims. Whether they did it for the money or for fame, bottomline is they chose to do that. I would like to give them the benefit of the doubt that they are thinking individuals who know the consequences of their actions. Further, could we please stop looking at these scandals from the gender perspective? If we think that these sex video scandals are abominable, then both male and female actors are actually affected by the repercussions of their indiscretions.
So for those who are inclined to use this scandal as a platform for grandstanding, I urge you to think twice. We can only handle so much trauma in our lifetime.